Table of Contents
Introduction
The Evolving Role of Human Resource Management in MNCs
Key Factors Influencing HRM Transfer Decisions
Maintaining Control and Core Values
Technology Transfer and Knowledge Sharing
Host Country Environment: Legal and Cultural Considerations
Employee Development and Fostering International Networks
Competitive Advantage and Strategic Alignment
Additional Considerations for Effective HRM Transfer
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Financial Implications
Cultural Sensitivity: Adapting to Local Norms and Values
Alternative Approaches to International HRM
The Future of HRM Transfer: Flexibility and Adaptation in a Globalized World
Conclusion
Reference List
The landscape of Human Resource Management (HRM) within Multinational Corporations (MNCs) has undergone a significant transformation. Traditionally focused on staffing subsidiaries with expatriate personnel, HRM now plays a critical strategic role. This paper explores the key factors influencing the decision of MNCs to transfer HRM practices and personnel to their overseas subsidiaries.
The Evolving Role of Human Resource Management in MNCs
In the past, MNCs often relied on expatriate management to oversee operations in their international branches. While expatriates can offer valuable experience and cultural understanding, a solely expatriate-driven HRM approach presents limitations. Today, HRM in MNCs plays a more strategic and integrated role. It focuses on ensuring consistency and cultural alignment across subsidiaries while maintaining control over core company values.
Key Factors Influencing HRM Transfer Decisions
Several factors influence the decision to transfer HRM practices and personnel to overseas subsidiaries:
Maintaining Control and Core Values: MNCs may transfer HRM personnel to ensure control over subsidiary operations and safeguard core company values. Expatriate HR professionals familiar with the parent company’s culture can promote consistent organizational structures and practices within the subsidiary. This helps to maintain brand identity and ensures adherence to established policies and procedures.
Technology Transfer and Knowledge Sharing: In some cases, HRM transfer is necessary to facilitate technology transfer to subsidiaries lacking the necessary expertise. HR professionals from the parent company can train local staff on the proper implementation and use of new technologies, ensuring a smooth transition and maximizing the effectiveness of the technology within the subsidiary.
Host Country Environment: Legal and Cultural Considerations: The legal and cultural environment of the host country significantly impacts HRM transfer decisions. Permissive host countries with open immigration policies and regulations facilitating the transfer of HRM personnel make the process smoother. Conversely, restrictive countries with limitations on foreign worker visas or stringent cultural norms may hinder or prevent such transfers.
Employee Development and Fostering International Networks: MNCs may choose to transfer HRM personnel to provide international exposure and development opportunities for their employees. This global experience fosters a broader perspective within the organization and facilitates the creation of international networks. These networks enable knowledge sharing, collaboration, and the exchange of best practices across different subsidiaries.
Competitive Advantage and Strategic Alignment: Skilled HRM professionals can contribute to a subsidiary’s competitive advantage by implementing effective training and development programs for local staff. Transferring HRM also facilitates the alignment of subsidiary practices with the overall strategic goals of the MNC. This ensures consistency in operations and promotes a unified approach to achieving corporate objectives.
Additional Considerations for Effective HRM Transfer
While the factors mentioned above provide a framework for understanding HRM transfer decisions, additional considerations are vital for successful implementation:
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Financial Implications: Transferring HRM personnel can be expensive due to relocation costs, salary adjustments, and potential cultural training. MNCs must weigh these financial implications against the potential benefits of improved control, knowledge transfer, and strategic alignment. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is crucial for making informed decisions.
Cultural Sensitivity: Adapting to Local Norms and Values: Successful HRM transfer requires sensitivity to the cultural norms and values of the host country. Expatriate HR professionals must adapt their practices and communication styles to avoid conflicts and promote local employee engagement. Building trust and fostering a sense of cultural respect are essential for effective intercultural collaboration within the subsidiary.
Alternative Approaches to International HRM
MNCs can explore alternative approaches to international HRM besides full transfer. These may include:
Regional HRM Hubs: Establishing regional centers dedicated to overseeing HRM practices across several subsidiaries within a specific geographic area. This approach offers a balance between centralized control and regional flexibility.
Local Talent Acquisition with International Training Programs: Recruiting and developing local HR talent while providing opportunities for international training and development programs to broaden their skill sets. This approach fosters a culturally sensitive workforce and leverages the local talent pool.
Partnerships with Local HR Consultancies: Leveraging the expertise of local HR consulting firms to bridge the cultural gap and ensure compliance with local regulations. This approach can be cost-effective and provide valuable insights into the host country’s legal and cultural environment.
The Future of HRM Transfer: Flexibility and Adaptation in a Globalized World
The future of HRM transfer is likely to be more nuanced and adaptable, driven by advancements in technology and the evolving global talent pool. Here’s what we can expect:
Technological Advancements and Virtual Collaboration: Advancements in communication and collaboration tools, such as video conferencing platforms and cloud-based HR software, may reduce the need for physical relocation of HR personnel. These tools can facilitate remote collaboration between HR professionals in the parent company and local HR staff in subsidiaries, fostering knowledge sharing and efficient communication.
A More Diverse and Localized Talent Pool: The global talent pool for HR professionals is constantly growing. MNCs may increasingly find qualified HR personnel with international experience in their host countries. This can facilitate a more localized approach to HRM, with local HR professionals leading the charge while leveraging support and expertise from the parent company as needed.
Hybrid Models and a Focus on Flexibility: A hybrid approach combining elements of traditional HRM transfer with alternative methods may become more common. This could involve short-term assignments for expatriate HR professionals to provide initial guidance and training, followed by a transition to a more localized HR team. Flexibility will be key, allowing MNCs to tailor their HRM approach to the specific needs and circumstances of each subsidiary.
Focus on Cultural Intelligence and Global Leadership Development: As MNCs navigate an increasingly interconnected world, fostering cultural intelligence and global leadership skills within their HR departments will be crucial. This includes developing an understanding of diverse work styles, fostering intercultural communication, and promoting a sense of global citizenship within the HR team.
The decision to transfer HRM practices and personnel to overseas subsidiaries remains a strategic balancing act for MNCs. By carefully considering the influencing factors, conducting thorough cost-benefit analyses, and adapting to cultural nuances, MNCs can leverage their HRM expertise to achieve success in the global marketplace. The future of HRM transfer is likely to be more flexible and adaptable, utilizing technology and a diverse talent pool to optimize international operations and foster a truly global workforce.
Beechler, S. & Taylor, S. 1994. ‘The Transfer of Human Resource Management Systems Overseas: An Exploratory Study of Japane.se and American Maquiladoras’. London and New York: Routledge.
Cho, K., R. & Padmanabhan, P. 1995. ‘Acquisition versus New Venture: The Choice of Foreign Establishment Mode by Japanese Finns’. Journal of International Management. 1(3). Pp. 25-85.
Doz, Y. & Prahalad, C., K. 1986: Controlled variety: a challenge for human resource management in MNCs. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2). Pp. 16-34.
Ferner, A. 1994. Multinational companies and Human Resource Management: an overview of research issues, Human Resource Management Journal, 4(3), pp 71-102.
Harzing, A. 1995: International Human Resource Management, 1995. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kobrin, S., J. 1988. ‘Expatriate Reduction and Strategic Control in American Multinational Corporations’. Human Resource Management Journal. 27(1). Pp. 63-75.
Myloni, B., Harzing, A., K., and Mirza, H., 2004. “Host country specific factors and the transfer of human resource management practices in multinational companies”, International Journal of Manpower. 25(6). Pp. 518 – 534.
Myloni, B., Harzing, A.W. & Mirza, H., R. 2003. Organisational factors and their effect on the transfer of human resource management practices from parent companies to their overseas affiliates: European and US headquarters and their Greek subsidiaries, paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the European Academy of Management, April 3-5, 2003, Milan, Italy.
Scullion, H. 1994. Staffing policies and strategic control in British multinationals International Studies of Management and Organization. Journal of International Management. 24(3). Pp: 86-104
Smith, C., McSweeney, B. & Fitzgerald, R. 2008. Remaking management: between global and local. Cambridge University Press.
Tung, R., L. & Punnett, B., J. 1993. Research in International Human Resource Management. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Yongsun, P. & Junghoon, D., S. 2004. Expatriate managers and MNC’s ability to control international subsidiaries: the case of Japanese MNCs. Journal of World Business 39(4). Pp. 61-71.